Leeeeeeeets get reeeeeaaaaaady to ruuuuuuuuummmmmmble!!!
The first of the BFOP great debates took place this week with Nick Fletcher and Matt Krumins going head to head battling it out in the custom build podcast-arena (it was actually just on Zoom but that sounds lame). This month is all about whether it is best to buy the f/2.8 or f/4 version of a lens and wow does it go off the rails…
Tune in to hear the pros and cons, the snippy remarks and all things apertures as Wesley Moss attempts to mediate these fools!
6 thoughts on “Episode 2: f/2.8 vs f/4 lenses… FIGHT!”
Agree with everything you’ve said and when I started I was using the smaller aperture lenses but when I got interested in sports I realised the f/2.8 weather proof was a much better investment. I have Pentax equipment and find that the top end gear provides a better result. My bag carries all f/2.8 gear in 12-24, 24-70, 70-200 and the only different lens is the 150-450 f/4.5 – f/5.6.
Great podcast and hope to eventually make it to Bright. Thanks
We love you Nick!
We love you too Mark!
Way to go Matt for bringing it back to the ordinary people – the majority of us camera users.
Matt is a champagne socialist if ever I met one!
Agree with everything you’ve said and when I started I was using the smaller aperture lenses but when I got interested in sports I realised the f/2.8 weather proof was a much better investment. I have Pentax equipment and find that the top end gear provides a better result. My bag carries all f/2.8 gear in 12-24, 24-70, 70-200 and the only different lens is the 150-450 f/4.5 – f/5.6.
Great podcast and hope to eventually make it to Bright. Thanks
You speak sense Alex!
Nick